Your selections:
- Lowry, Sean, de Freitas, Nancy
Access to journals through peer reviewers (Letter)
- McGee, Richard G., Hemsley, Bronwyn, Gill, Peter J.
Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective
Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general practice registrars
Journal peer review: comparing the perceptions and quality judgments of experienced Australian reviewers in education and the physical sciences
Internal coherence matters: Lessons for nutrition and dietetics research
- Palermo, Claire, Reidlinger, Dianne P., Rees, Charlotte E.
Learning to be confident and capable journal reviewers: an Australian perspective
Quality improvement research: can it be published? (editorial)
Review of the Australian Incident Monitoring System
- Spigelman, Allan David, Swan, Judith
Is peer review in academic publishing still working?
- Jackson, Liz, Peters, Michael A., Locke, Kirsten, Mihaila, Ramona, Stewart, Georgina, Tesar, Marek, Roberts, Peter, Ozoliņš, Jānis John, Benade, Leon, Devine, Nesta, Arndt, Sonja, Forster, Daniella, Gibbons, Andrew, Grierson, Elizabeth, Jandrić, Petar, Lazaroiu, George
Using nominal group technique to develop a consensus derived model for peer review of teaching across a multi-school faculty
- Burrows, Tracy, Findlay, Naomi, Killen, Chloe, Dempsey, Shane E., Hunter, Sharyn, Chiarelli, Pauline, Snodgrass, Suzanne J.
Multiple perspective assessment to manage free riders in group work
- Gajendran, Thayaparan, Brewer, Graham, Mackee, Jamie, Williams, Tony
How many papers should scientists be reviewing?: An analysis using verified peer review reports
- McGee, Richard G., Graves, Lara E., Barnett, Adrian
Are you sure you would like to clear your session, including search history and login status?